Pope Leo XIV released his first encyclical this morning, and the photograph the wire services chose was not of the pope alone. It was of Christopher Olah, Anthropic co-founder, standing at a Vatican lectern as the document was unveiled. The Associated Press headline put it bluntly: the pope calls out AI companies even as he hosts Anthropic. That tension is the whole story.

The encyclical is called Magnifica Humanitas, roughly forty-two thousand words across eighty-three pages, and its argument is that artificial intelligence is the labour-and-dignity question of this century in the way industrial mechanisation was the question of the century the Catholic Church first wrote about in Rerum Novarum. Leo, an American mathematician by training, has been telegraphing this framing since the days after his election in May 2025, when he named AI as the defining challenge of his papacy. So the document itself was not a surprise. The supporting cast was.

The Vatican could have launched a 42,300-word manifesto on AI with any number of partners. It picked a frontier lab presently locked in a legal fight with the Trump administration over access to its own technology, and it put that lab's chief interpretability researcher at the podium. Olah is not the policy face of Anthropic; he is the mechanistic-interpretability lead, the person whose work is closest to the actual question of whether anyone understands what these models are doing internally. Choosing him rather than Amodei was a curatorial decision, not an accident. The Vatican wanted the scientist, not the lobbyist.

What the encyclical itself says is harder than the press summaries suggest. Leo writes that it is "not permissible" to delegate irreversible lethal decisions to AI systems, which lands as a direct rebuke to autonomous-weapons procurement and, by extension, the deregulatory current the current US administration has set running. He calls on developers to "disarm AI" in a sense that goes beyond weapons: disarm it of the assumption that profit organises its deployment, disarm it of the cultural authority to displace whole classes of work without negotiation, disarm it of the presumption that speed is its own justification. The CNET write-up notes that the phrase is already the line being quoted back, and you can see why. It is the kind of formulation that survives translation.

What is interesting about Anthropic's presence is that the lab has, for two years, been the loudest internal voice arguing roughly this position from inside the industry. The pope disagrees with most of how Anthropic operates and has now said so in the most formal document a pope can produce. Anthropic showed up anyway, and let him. That is either an extraordinary act of public humility or an extremely sophisticated piece of positioning, and the honest answer is probably both at once. The encyclical will be quoted in regulatory hearings for years. Olah was in the photograph.

Sources: