Marc Jacobs sent his Spring 1993 collection for Perry Ellis down a runway at the brand's Seventh Avenue showroom on the evening of 3 November 1992. Bill Clinton was being elected president the same night. The two facts are not connected except by coincidence, but the coincidence is useful for orientation: the country was about to change governments, and a twenty-nine-year-old designer was about to lose his job by mistaking what the brand executives in the room actually wanted.

The collection took grunge, then a Seattle music scene that had not yet learned to take itself seriously, and translated it into sportswear made of materials that grunge specifically refused. Two-dollar second-hand flannel shirts became printed silks. Lumberjack thermals became cashmere. Kurt Cobain's floral granny dresses became chiffon. Doc Martens stayed Doc Martens, though Converse appeared too, rendered in duchesse satin. Christy Turlington opened the show to L7's "Pretend We're Dead." Kate Moss and Kristen McMenamy closed it in matching beanies and layered pastel knits. Naomi Campbell wore combat boots and a silk flannel shirt, possibly for the first and last time in her career.

What Jacobs had done, technically, was the brief. Perry Ellis sportswear was supposed to read American youth. He had read American youth correctly, more correctly than the company executives at any of the meetings, and translated it into luxury fabrics at a price point the brand sat at. The mistake was that Perry Ellis did not want to be told what its customers were already wearing. It wanted to dress the customer the buyers thought it had. Suzy Menkes wrote "Grunge Is Ghastly" in the International Herald Tribune, then had pins made saying the same thing. Bernadine Morris in the New York Times described the looks as "put together with the eyes closed in a very dark room." The Council of Fashion Designers of America named Jacobs Designer of the Year in January 1993. Perry Ellis terminated his contract shortly afterward and killed production on the collection. The clothes were never shipped to stores. The samples sent to Cobain and Courtney Love were reportedly burned, which is the kind of detail that would not survive fact-checking if the people involved had been less famous.

The reason the show matters, beyond the brand drama, is the gap between what the room heard and what the December 1992 issue of Vogue published a few weeks later. Steven Meisel had photographed a Grace Coddington–styled editorial called "Grunge & Glory," running Kristen McMenamy, Naomi Campbell, and Nadja Auermann in warmly-shot Perry Ellis plaid and Nirvana T-shirts. The editorial worked. The clothes, photographed by Meisel and styled by Coddington, looked like the future of how women might actually want to dress. The same garments, walked under showroom lights by a young Kate Moss, had looked like the end of the world to half the front row. It is the same disjunction that played out at the other end of the same season, on a different runway, where a different designer was being read incorrectly by people in the room and correctly by the magazine that would canonise him later.

Jacobs went to Louis Vuitton in 1997 with Robert Duffy and spent the next sixteen years there. The grunge collection became one of the most reproduced editorial images of the 1990s, reissued by Jacobs himself in 2018, taught in fashion schools as the example of a show that was right at the wrong moment for the company that paid for it. The lesson everyone draws is that the executives were wrong and Jacobs was right. What nobody draws is the harder one, which is that the executives were doing their job. A brand whose customer is a forty-five-year-old in a midwestern department store does not benefit from being told its customer's daughter is going to wear ripped flannel instead. The show did exactly what the buyers feared. It also did exactly what fashion needed. Both sentences can be true on the same night.

Sources: